Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
In Search of Radiographic Quantitative Data for Pediatric Brain Tumors - AJNR News Digest
May-June 2018
Introduction
Figure 3 from Yeom

In Search of Radiographic Quantitative Data for Pediatric Brain Tumors

Ho Pic

Chang Yueh Ho

Pediatric brain tumors are the number one cause of cancer-related deaths in children.

Childhood cancer is the leading cause of death beyond infancy due to disease in the United States, with leukemia as the most common cancer. From 1975 to 2013, 5-year survival rates for childhood cancer have improved from just over 50% to 83%, primarily from an improvement in the treatment of leukemia and lymphomas. As a result, pediatric brain tumors are now the most common causes of cancer-related mortality, in addition to being the most common solid tumors in children. Five hundred and thirty-four children died of brain cancer in the United States in 2014.1 Compared with adult brain tumors, pediatric tumors as a heterogeneous group have a better prognosis; however, significant comorbidities are being recognized in survivors, including greater risks of hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, and type 2 diabetes, as well as decreased levels of cognitive and social function, with an overall decreased quality of life.2 As a group, the incidence of pediatric CNS tumors is 5.54 per 100,000, and an estimated 3560 new patients are expected to be diagnosed in the United States in 2018.3

The quantification of radiographic phenotypes will improve radiomics.

Radiomics, particularly in the field of oncologic imaging, is a necessary evolution to keep pace with the seemingly rapid advances in the field of molecular genomics of individual cancers. Understanding specific molecular expressions of a patient’s tumor allows more targeted therapy that would be more effective and potentially less toxic. Radiographic exams of pediatric brain tumors are not just images; they represent data to be quantified, and with computational help, to be used in a multiparametric approach to serve as specific imaging biomarkers for tumor genotypes and molecular expressions. This field of radiomics will improve diagnosis by predicting not only tumor type, but also subtype and prognosis, as well as guiding surgical approach, particularly when gross total resection is not safely achievable. The remainder of this introduction will focus on advanced techniques that are applicable for the quantification of all pediatric brain tumors, as well as specific advances in radiomic knowledge for each of the most common tumor types.

Diffusion imaging remains a mainstay of tumor grading.

DWI and resulting ADC are well-accepted methods of differentiating high-grade and low-grade tumors, likely based on an inverse relationship between ADC and tumor cellularity. Koral et al4 systematically evaluated the added value of DWI and ADC in pediatric cerebellar tumors, where 5 out of 6 reviewers showed a significant improvement in diagnosis with DWI/ADC and the correct diagnosis increased by greater than 3-fold. Vajapeyam et al5 combined ADC histograms and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) permeability in a multiparametric approach with a combined ROC analysis of 0.92 area under the curve. Rodriguez Gutierrez et al6 used ADC map texture features and resulting histogram analysis in a machine-based classification, which showed greater than 91% accuracy for all of the included pediatric posterior fossa tumors and was able to discriminate 89.4% of classic histologic medulloblastomas from nonclassic medulloblastomas. Finally, multiple-b-value diffusion modeling (intravoxel incoherent motion) has also shown promise in differentiating high- and low-grade tumors with parameters such as the true diffusion coefficient and pseudodiffusion, which correlates with capillary perfusion.7

Perfusion techniques can differentiate high- and low-grade tumors.

Given their high metabolic demand, higher grade tumors have a propensity for neoangiogenesis and vascular recruitment, leading to a greater blood volume and flow relative to the normal white matter. This has been typically investigated with DSC, which utilizes a bolus of gadolinium with T2*-weighted echo-planar imaging for the quantification of first-pass bolus effects. Our group has published one of the largest DSC studies on pediatric brain tumors, finding that the use of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) had high sensitivity and negative predictive value in discriminating low and high tumor grades, but is limited in specificity. We concluded that the use of rCBV in routine practice for experienced pediatric neuroimagers may be helpful in cases when conventional imaging is nonspecific.8

DCE is a T1-based perfusion technique that maps the rise in T1 signal over time as gadolinium washes into the tumor, with permeability as a primary quantified measure. In addition to the multiparametric approach with ADC, Vajapeyam et al9 found higher grade tumors to have higher transfer constants (Ktrans) and rate constants (Kep), but lower extravascular extracellular volume fractions (Ve). All 3 parameters achieved high specificity (82–100%), with Ve having the highest sensitivity (71%).

With the current literature demonstrating linear gadolinium brain deposition, the use of lower relaxivity macrocyclics may be safer, or it may be better yet to utilize perfusion techniques without contrast at all. Yeom et al10 used 3D pseudocontinuous ASL to significantly differentiate high- and low-grade tumors using relative tumor blood flow.

Medulloblastoma subtypes are further classified by risk stratification.

The subtyping of medulloblastomas into 4 different molecular pathway subgroups—WNT, SHH, group 3, and group 4—each with a differing tumor behavior and prognosis, has changed how we view the most common malignant pediatric brain tumor. This was recently summarized by Dr. Marlene Baumann in the November–December 2017 AJNR News Digest. However, even this recent classification system was modified by Ramaswamy et al11 according to risk stratification into low risk (>90% survival), standard risk (75–90%), high risk (50–75%), and very high risk (<50%) for childhood medulloblastomas outside of the infantile subgroup. WNT and nonmetastatic group 4 tumors with whole chromosome 11 loss or 17 gain are low-risk and may qualify for less toxic therapy. Standard-risk tumors include nonmetastatic, non-TP53, non-MYCN-amplified SHH, and non-MYCN-amplified group 3 and 4 without chromosome 11 loss. High-risk tumors include metastatic SHH or group 4 tumors, as well as MYCN-amplified SHH. Finally, very high-risk tumors include group 3 with metastases or SHH with TP53 mutations. Further correlation of radiographic tumor types with these risk groups would be helpful to predict prognosis and guide treatment.

Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas showing decreased diffusion have a shorter survival.

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) continues to have one of the worst prognoses for pediatric brain tumors, with a median survival of 6 months and no effective treatment options. Recent discoveries of histone mutations (H3.1 or H3.3, position K27) of midline gliomas may help develop targeted therapy for this devastating disease. Aboian et al12 described radiographic phenotypes of histone H3K27-mutated midline gliomas, which were located in the pons, thalamus, vermis, and spinal cord. They described various appearances, from nonenhancing expansile infiltrative masses to areas of central necrosis and peripheral enhancement with little adjacent T2 hyperintensity, which did not allow significant distinguishing features from non-H3K27-mutated gliomas. Ceschin et al13 evaluated serial ADC maps of patients with DIPG treated for pseudoprogression with peptide-based vaccines. They found that their cohort with pseudoprogression had significantly higher fractional decreased ADC values. Finally, Poussaint et al14 found that in a trial with DIPG that decreased ADC, increased skewness and contrast enhancement correlated with a shorter survival.

Specific low-grade gliomas such as pilomyxoid astrocytomas and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXAs) can have worse outcomes.

Low-grade astrocytomas are the most common pediatric primary brain tumors and generally have good outcomes. When symptoms, a lack of gross total resection, and tumor growth necessitate treatment, current chemotherapy typically includes carboplatin, with a 10–20-year overall survival of 83–94%. Future therapy may include BRAF-targeting agents, as this is the most common mutation in low-grade gliomas, including pilocytic astrocytomas. However, not all low-grade gliomas have good outcomes; 6.3% have dissemination at presentation or follow-up.15 PXAs and thalamic locations are also adverse risk factors.16

Pilomyxoid astrocytomas have been reported to have higher rates of dissemination and even malignant transformation. Our experience with DSC perfusion using 90° flip angles, which does not suppress the T1 signal, showed a high sensitivity (91%) and specificity (90%) for pilomyxoid and pilocytic astrocytomas when the percent signal return went beyond the baseline on time–signal intensity curves. However, we were not able to distinguish pilocytic and pilomyxoid pathologies using this method.17

Although rare, PXAs are outliers for low-grade gliomas in that the overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were only 76% and 68%, respectively. Little in the literature focuses solely on PXAs. Moore et al18 described the imaging phenotype in a cohort of 9 children with PXA, showing that most are supratentorial, cortically based with inner table scalloping, and have cysts and marked adjacent edema with low ADC values and ratios compared with normal brains.

In young children, ependymomas of the posterior fossa and RELA mutation in the supratentorium are associated with poor overall survival.

The second most common malignant brain tumor in children is ependymoma, and the subtypes with the poorest overall survival are also the most common in young children. These include group A posterior fossa tumors and C11orf9r-RELA fusion tumors in the supratentorium. This is in contrast to group B tumors in the posterior fossa seen in adolescents and adults and Yap1 fusion-positive tumors in the supratentorium.19 No current isolated genetic mutation is known to distinguish groups A and B posterior fossa ependymomas. Little evidence focusing specifically on ependymomas is in the radiology literature. Most papers describing radiographic phenotypes of ependymoma include a large cohort of other pediatric brain tumors, so this is an underexplored realm of research.

A clarion call for quantitative radiographic biomarkers for specific tumor genetics:

The future of radiographic imaging research in the realm of pediatric brain tumors is clear. As radiologists, we must stay relevant as key players in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric brain tumors beyond whether there is a tumor and whether it is causing hydrocephalus. The growing amount of quantitative data in the literature—whether obtained through diffusion, perfusion, texture analysis, or relaxometry—must be bridged to the advancing genomic knowledge to have the maximum impact on patient outcomes.

References

  1. Curtin SC, Miniño AM, Anderson RN. Declines in cancer death rates among children and adolescents in the United States, 1999–2014. NCHS data brief, no 257. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2016.
  2. Wang KW, Fleming A, Singh SK, et al. Evaluating overweight and obesity prevalence in survivors of childhood brain tumors: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2017;6:43, 10.1186/s13643-017-0439-1.
  3. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Xu J, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010-2014. Neuro Oncol 2017;18(s5):v1v88, 10.1093/neuonc/nox158.
  4. Koral K, Zhang S, Gargan L, et al. Diffusion MRI improves the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of common pediatric cerebellar tumors among reviewers with different experience levelsAJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:236065, 10.3174/ajnr.A3596.
  5. Vajapeyam S, Brown D, Johnston PR, et al. Multiparametric analysis of permeability and ADC histogram metrics for classification of pediatric brain tumors by tumor grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018 Jan 4. [Epub ahead of print]
  6. Rodriguez Gutierrez D, Awwad A, Meijer L, et al. Metrics and textural features of MRI diffusion to improve classification of pediatric posterior fossa tumorsAJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1009–15, 10.3174/ajnr.A3784.
  7. Burrowes D, Fangusaro JR, Nelson PC, et al. Extended diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging with two-compartment and anomalous diffusion models for differentiation of low-grade and high-grade brain tumors in pediatric patients. Neuroradiology 2017;59:803–11.
  8. Ho CY, Cardinal JS, Kamer AP, et al. Relative cerebral blood volume from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the grading of pediatric primary brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2015;57:299–306.
  9. Vajapeyam S, Stamoulis C, Ricci K, et al. Automated processing of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: correlation of advanced pharmacokinetic metrics with tumor grade in pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:170–75, 10.3174/ajnr.A4949.
  10. Yeom KW, Mitchell LA, Lober RM, et al. Arterial spin-labeled perfusion of pediatric brain tumorsAJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:395–401, 10.3174/ajnr.A3670.
  11. Ramaswamy V, Remke M, Bouffet E, et al. Risk stratification of childhood medulloblastoma in the molecular era: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:821–31.
  12. Aboian MS, Solomon DA, Felton E, et al. Imaging characteristics of pediatric diffuse midline gliomas with histone H3 K27M mutation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:795–800, 10.3174/ajnr.A5076.
  13. Ceschin R, Kurland BF, Abberbock SR, et al. Parametric response mapping of apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker to distinguish pseudoprogression from true tumor progression in peptide-based vaccine therapy for pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomaAJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2170–76, 10.3174/ajnr.A4428.
  14. Poussaint TY, Vajapeyam S, Ricci KI, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram metrics correlate with survival in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a report from the Pediatric Brain Tumor ConsortiumNeuro Oncol 2016;18:725–34, 10.1093/neuonc/nov256.
  15. Chamdine O, Broniscer A, Wu S, et al. Metastatic low-grade gliomas in children: 20 years' experience at St. Jude Children's Research HospitalPediatr Blood Cancer 2016;63:62–70, 10.1002/pbc.25731.
  16. Krishnatry R, Zhukova N, Guerreiro Stucklin AS, et al. Clinical and treatment factors determining long-term outcomes for adult survivors of childhood low-grade glioma: a population-based studyCancer 2016 15;122:1261–69, 10.1002/cncr.29907.
  17. Ho CY, Cardinal JS, Kamer AP, et al. Contrast leakage patterns from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in the grading of primary pediatric brain tumorsAJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:544–51, 10.3174/ajnr.A4559.
  18. Moore W, Mathis D, Gargan L, et al. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma of childhood: MR imaging and diffusion MR imaging featuresAJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2192–96, 10.3174/ajnr.A4011.
  19. Gajjar A, Bowers DC, Karajannis MA, et al. Pediatric brain tumors: innovative genomic information is transforming the diagnostic and clinical landscape. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2986–98, 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9217.

Figure 2 from paper

Axial T2 FLAIR (A), axial T1-weighted postcontrast (B), axial DSC perfusion rCBV map (C), and tissue signal-intensity time curve (D) of a pilocytic astrocytoma with atypical appearance. Despite apparent increased rCBV, poorly defined margins, central necrosis, and surrounding T2 hyperintensity suggesting a high-grade neoplasm, the T1-dominant leakage pattern suggests the correct interpretation of a low-grade tumor. The ROI is placed in the highest perfusing portion of the tumor, not including a dominant central vessel. Figure 2 from Ho CY, Cardinal JS, Kamer AP, et al. Contrast leakage patterns from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in the grading of primary pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:544–51, 10.3174/ajnr.A4559.

Figure 4 from paper

ASL perfusion (left) of various low-grade tumors and correlative axial T2-weighted MR image (middle) and axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image (right). A, Low rTBF is seen within the pilocytic astrocytoma (arrow) with some tumor regions that show ASL signal similar to the contralateral gray matter in a 9-year-old boy. B, DNT shows low ASL signal (arrow) in a 9-year-old boy. C, Higher rTBF (arrow) compared with DNT (B) is seen in a 3-year-old girl with left frontal ganglioglioma. Figure 4 from Yeom KW, Mitchell LA, Lober RM, et al. Arterial spin-labeled perfusion of pediatric brain tumorsAJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:395–401, 10.3174/ajnr.A3670.

Image from: Yeom KW, Mitchell LA, Lober RM, et al. Arterial spin-labeled perfusion of pediatric brain tumorsAJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:395–401, 10.3174/ajnr.A3670.