Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
Detection of Mesial Temporal Lobe Hypoperfusion in Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy by Use of Arterial Spin Labeled Perfusion MR Imaging - AJNR News Digest
April 2014
Brain

Detection of Mesial Temporal Lobe Hypoperfusion in Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy by Use of Arterial Spin Labeled Perfusion MR Imaging

Ronald I. Wolf

Ronald I. Wolf

Complex partial seizures, often arising in the temporal lobe, are the most common etiology of medically intractable acquired epilepsy in adults, but seizure foci can be difficult to lateralize let alone localize. These patients typically undergo multimodality testing, including structural MRI, EEG, PET, fMRI and/or intracarotid amytal testing, and in some cases ictal or interictal SPECT and proton MR spectroscopy. When considering this project, hypometabolism on interictal [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose PET (18FDG-PET) had been shown to contribute to seizure lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Initial comparisons to interictal H215O-PET blood flow measurements showed that these were less successful in lateralizing seizures due to flow-metabolism uncoupling,1–3  but there was also evidence that coupling of flow and metabolism could be intact. Wu et al,4 for example, used DSC perfusion MRI to show decreased interictal rCBV (and increased ictal rCBV) in the mesial temporal lobe on the side of seizures, which correlated with 18FDG-PET predictions.

The intent of our work was to explore ASL perfusion MRI as a quantitative and completely noninvasive alternative for seizure lateralization in TLE as opposed to DSC perfusion MRI, which is semiquantitative and requires IV contrast administration as compared with 18FDG-PET, which requires IV radiotracer administration and has higher cost and less availability. Using an early multisection continuous ASL perfusion MRI approach,5 we found asymmetrically decreased interictal mesial temporal CBF in patients with TLE with lateralization of seizures correlating with 18FDG-PET hypometabolism, and also with hippocampal volumes and clinical evaluation. Global absolute CBF measurements were also decreased in seizure patients compared with controls. Close to the time of publication of our study, Liu et al6 compared a single-section PASL perfusion technique (FAIR-HASTE) to H215O-PET perfusion in patients with TLE, also showing interictal hypoperfusion on the side of seizures. Other studies confirm that coupling of flow and metabolism can be intact7–12 in this setting.

Perfusion imaging in seizure disorders like TLE has some challenges including small lesion volumes (also true for small subtle seizure foci associated with lesions such as focal cortical dysplasias), symmetric abnormalities such as bilateral mesial temporal sclerosis, and artifacts in mesial temporal or frontal regions due to the proximity of bone and air-containing structures. Innovations in implementation of ASL perfusion MRI address these challenges to an extent; for example, 3D background-suppressed pseudocontinuous ASL with GRASE or FSE readout strategies are now available with improved resolution and SNR as well as improved visualization of structures near the skull base.13–15 Analogous to strategies like ictal-postictal SPECT subtraction (SISCOM), coregistration of multiple modalities, including perfusion maps, can help in localizing subtle, previously undetected structural abnormalities,11,12,16—a promising application of state-of-the-art ASL perfusion methodology.

More challenging for MR perfusion techniques is ictal imaging, though this would be attractive for improved detection of lesional and nonlesional seizure foci. Ictal SPECT studies are better suited to this approach because the tracer can be injected as the patient begins a seizure and then scanned after the patient has recovered, a practice logistically difficult with MRI (though not impossible).12,17–19 In practice, the most likely clinical application for ictal MR perfusion imaging is in the acute or subacute setting for status epilepticus or other reversible disorders like eclampsia and post-CEA hyperperfusion syndrome.20,21

References

  1. Fink GR, Pawlik G, Stefan H, et al. Temporal lobe epilepsy: evidence for interictal uncoupling of blood flow and glucose metabolism in temporomesial structures. J Neurol Sci 1996;137:28–34
  2. Gaillard WD, Fazilat S, White S, et al. Interictal metabolism and blood flow are uncoupled in temporal lobe cortex of patients with complex partial epilepsy. Neurology 1995;45:1841–47
  3. Leiderman DB, Balish M, Sato S, et al. Comparison of PET measurements of cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism for the localization of human epileptic foci. Epilepsy Res 1992;13:153–57
  4. Wu RH, Bruening R, Noachtar S, et al. MR measurement of regional relative cerebral blood volume in epilepsy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:43–40
  5. Wolf RL, Alsop DC, Levy-Reis I, et al. Detection of mesial temporal lobe hypoperfusion in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy by use of arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1334–41
  6. Liu HL, Kochunov P, Hou J, et al. Perfusion-weighted imaging of interictal hypoperfusion in temporal lobe epilepsy using FAIR-HASTE: comparison with H215O PET measurements. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:431–35
  7. Brown GG, Clark C, Liu TT. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with arterial spin labeling: Part 2. Applications. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007;13:526–38.
  8. Carmichael DW, Hamandi K, Laufs H, et al. An investigation of the relationship between BOLD and perfusion signal changes during epileptic generalised spike wave activity. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:870–73
  9. Stefanovic B, Warnking JM, Kobayashi E, et al. Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to activation, deactivation and epileptic discharges. Neuroimage 2005;28:205–15
  10. Lim YM, Cho YW, Shamim S, et al. Usefulness of pulsed arterial spin labeling MR imaging in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2008;82:183–89
  11. Pendse N, Wissmeyer M, Altrichter S, et al. Interictal arterial spin-labeling MRI perfusion in intractable epilepsy. J Neuroradiol 2010;37:60–63
  12. Storti SF, Boscolo Galazzo I, Del Felice A, et al. Combining ESI, ASL and PET for quantitative assessment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Neuroimage 2013 Jun 17. pii: S1053-8119(13)00665–4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.028. [Epub ahead of print]
  13. Alsop DC, Detre JA. Background suppressed 3D RARE arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 1999: 601
  14. Crelier GR, Hoge RD, Munger P, et al. Perfusion-based functional magnetic resonance imaging with single-shot RARE and GRASE acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:132–36
  15. Fernandez-Seara MA, Wang Z, Wang J, et al. Continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion measurements using single shot 3D GRASE at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1241–47
  16. Salamon N, Kung J, Shaw SJ, et al. FDG-PET/MRI coregistration improves detection of cortical dysplasia in patients with epilepsy. Neurology 2008;71:1594–1601
  17. Toledo M, Munuera J, Salas-Puig X, et al. Localisation value of ictal arterial spin-labelled sequences in partial seizures. Epileptic Disord 2011;13:336–39
  18. Warach S, Levin JM, Schomer DL, et al. Hyperperfusion of ictal seizure focus demonstrated by MR perfusion imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:965–68
  19. Pizzini FB, Farace P, Manganotti P, et al. Cerebral perfusion alterations in epileptic patients during peri-ictal and post-ictal phase: PASL vs DSC-MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31:1001–05
  20. Deibler AR, Pollock JM, Kraft RA, et al. Arterial spin-labeling in routine clinical practice, part 3: hyperperfusion patterns. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1428–35
  21. Szabo K, Poepel A, Pohlmann-Eden B, et al. Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MRI demonstrates parenchymal changes in complex partial status epilepticus. Brain 2005;128:1369–76

 

Read this article at AJNR.org . . .