We made an observation of an increased T2 signal of the cerebellum in fetuses with the Chiari Type II malformation and myelomeningocele, and wondered whether this reflected a real change in the diffusion properties of the cerebellum. Our article describes that we did indeed find a difference when comparing this group with normal fetuses, supporting the hypothesis that this malformation is associated with abnormalities of cerebellar structures beyond those described classically. We presume the underlying mechanism relates to altered CSF flow dynamics, due to impaired venous drainage as a result of obstruction at the foramen magnum. This results in CSF pooling in the posterior fossa, increased extracellular CSF, and hence, measured mean diffusivity. The underlying theory of altered CSF flow and resultant cerebellar tonsillar herniation in open neural tube defects was demonstrated in sheep models and, more recently, was proven in humans, where reversal of tonsillar herniation and subsequent decreased rates of obstructive hydrocephalus necessitating ventriculoperitoneal shunting were shown post in utero closure of the spinal defect at 21–25 weeks’ gestation.1
However, whether our simplistic explanation accounts for our findings is uncertain. One could argue our findings reflect microstructural damage, as a result of compressive effects, or maldevelopment of the deep cerebellar tracts, similar to those of the supratentorial compartment, where lack of inductive pressure on the adjacent mesenchyme can result in focal developmental anomalies.2 Alternatively, maldevelopment may result from defective expression of a gene related to rhombomeric segmentation, as has been shown in other types of posterior fossa malformations, such as the Dandy-Walker malformation, where altered FOXC1 expression appears to be at least in part responsible for the spectrum of abnormalities demonstrated.3
If our proposed theory is correct, we would expect reversal or improvement of these findings post closure of the surgical defect. Unfortunately, given the small number of patients at our institutions opting to continue pregnancy, and an even smaller number who have proceeded to antenatal surgery, we have been unable to confirm our hypothesis. However, further