Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
Distinguishing between Germinomas and Pineal Cell Tumors on MR Imaging - AJNR News Digest
July 2014
Brain

Distinguishing between Germinomas and Pineal Cell Tumors on MR Imaging

Netsiri Dumrongpisutikul

Netsiri Dumrongpisutikul

Pineal region tumors constitute 1% of all intracranial tumors.1 Among the various histologic types of pineal tumors, the germ cell tumors are more frequent than the pineal cell origin tumors.2 Our research aimed to differentiate between germinomas and pineal cell tumors based on ADC values and MR imaging characteristics. The previous literature suggests that the common pineal region tumors have no pathognomonic imaging features.3 DWI is an imaging technique based on molecular motion of water, which has been routinely integrated for tumor evaluation. The availability of the postprocessing software made quantitative measurement of ADC value feasible. However, information regarding diffusitivity of the pineal tumors has yet to be established.

Besides the younger age in germinomas, male preponderance in germinoma and pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID), and female preponderance in pineocytoma, the results of our study emphasize that quantitative signal value and degree of heterogeneity on conventional imaging (T1WI and T2WI) cannot differentiate germinomas from those pineal cell tumors. The most experienced neuroradiologist can predict the correct diagnosis based on conventional imaging characteristics alone in only 55% of cases. Integration of quantitative ADC measurement into imaging analysis helps differentiate these two disease entities. Germinomas have statistically significant higher mean ADC values than pineal cell tumors (1590.69 ± 532.96×10 -6 mm2/s vs 883.58 ± 317.48×10-6 mm2/s; P=.02). The ADC threshold was set to facilitate clinical application. The ADC threshold of 1250.00×10-6 mm2/s yielded high accuracy (89.5%), sensitivity (83.3%), specificity (92.3%), positive predictive value (83.3%), and negative predictive value (92.3%).4

The ADC threshold has been used to predict diagnosis in clinical practice and showed good pathologic correlation. The use of quantitative ADC value is expanded in other brain tumors and challenging areas, including spinal cord, orbits, and the head and neck region, and different b-values have been used.

References

  1. Yousem DM, Grossman RI. Neoplasms of the brain. In: Yousem DM, Grossman RI, eds. Neuroradiology: The Requisites, 3rd ed., Philadelphia: Mosby;2010:94–98
  2. Dahiya S, Perry A. Pineal tumors. Adv Anat Pathol 2010;17:419-27, 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181f895a4
  3. Reis F, Faria AV, Zanardi VA, et al. Neuroimaging in pineal tumors. J Neuroimag 2006;16:52–58, 10.1177/1051228405001514
  4. Dumrongpisutikul N, Intrapiromkul J, Yousem DM. Distinguishing between germinomas and pineal cell tumors on MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:550–55

Read this article at AJNR.org . . .