Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MR Perfusion Imaging in Assessing Recurrent Glioblastoma Response to Superselective Intra-Arterial Bevacizumab Therapy - AJNR News Digest
March-April 2017
Brain

Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MR Perfusion Imaging in Assessing Recurrent Glioblastoma Response to Superselective Intra-Arterial Bevacizumab Therapy

Kovanlikaya pic

Ilhami Kovanlikaya

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common aggressive primary brain tumor. Despite an aggressive multimodal treatment approach that includes surgical resection and chemoradiation, median survival is limited to approximately 14 months.1

Until recently, there was no standard treatment for recurrent disease after combined chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Between 1998 and 2014, there were 78 investigational brain tumor drugs that entered the clinical trial evaluation process and, unfortunately, 75 of them failed. That is a 25:1 failure ratio in developing new brain tumor treatments over the past 2 decades.2 One of these FDA-approved drugs was bevacizumab (BV), a monoclonal antibody (immunoglobulin G) to vascular endothelial growth factor, which has been used with safety and some clinical success in recurrent GBM. Despite the limited success with IV usage of BV, all patients progress and require salvage therapy.3

Our group has initiated a trial using superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion (SIACI), a novel delivery technique of bevacizumab that may provide a more targeted treatment strategy.4 While treatment with bevacizumab produces dramatic decreases in contrast enhancement on MR imaging, the degree to which this imaging finding reflects an actual tumoricidal effect remains unclear. The inability of routine contrast-enhanced MR imaging to differentiate between response, progression, and/or treatment effects has led us to use MR perfusion (MRP) and other advanced molecular techniques in this trial.

In our study, by using DSC MRP, we sought to determine exactly how effective intra-arterial bevacizumab was in treating patients with recurrent GBM and whether it had tumoricidal effects. We found that there was a significant decrease in tumor perfusion metrics such as CBV and CBF within recurrent gliomas in response to SIACI of BV.

The results of our study have changed our practice here at Weill Cornell Medicine, and MRP sequences were added to our standard brain tumor imaging protocol specifically to assess the response to treatment.

Since the publication of our paper, we have received positive feedback from both radiologists and neurosurgeons. They now increasingly accept MRP as a decision-making tool to manage the treatment plans of patients with brain tumors.

Recently, we have started using histogram and texture analysis of MRP and other advanced MR imaging data, including quantitative susceptibility mapping of whole tumor volumes, to get more accurate characterization of tumor microenvironment along with radiogenomic analysis. We believe that this approach may eventually contribute even more to clinical decision-making by improving diagnosis, treatment management, and monitoring of treatment response.5

References

  1. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, et al; for European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups, the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:459–66, 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7
  2. PhRMA. Researching cancer medicines: setbacks and stepping stones. http://phrma-docs.phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2014-cancer-setbacks-report.pdf. Published June 2015.
  3. Zuniga RM, Torcuator R, Jain R, et al. Efficacy, safety and patterns of response and recurrence in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan. J Neurooncol 2009;91:329–36, 10.1007/s11060-008-9718-y
  4. Boockvar JA, Tsiouris AJ, Hofstetter CP, et al. Safety and maximum tolerated dose of superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion of bevacizumab after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption for recurrent malignant glioma. J Neurosurg 2011;114:624–32, 10.3171/.2010.9.JNS101223
  5. Kickingereder P, Bonekamp D, Nowosielski M, et al. Radiogenomics of
    glioblastoma: machine learning-based classification of molecular characteristics by using multiparametric and multiregional MR imaging features
    . Radiology 2016;281:907–18, 10.1148/radiol.2016161382

Read this article at AJNR.org …