Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
Frequency and Relevance of Anterior Cerebral Artery Embolism Caused by Mechanical Thrombectomy of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion - AJNR News Digest
October 2014
Interventional

Frequency and Relevance of Anterior Cerebral Artery Embolism Caused by Mechanical Thrombectomy of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Wiebke Kurre

Wiebke Kurre

Mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute stroke is gaining importance in the portfolio of neuro-endovascular procedures. With proper patient selection, optimized workflow, and advanced technique, angiographic and—even more importantly, clinical—success is convincing. Triggered by the rapid evolution of endovascular stroke treatment, randomized trials comparing standard therapy and mechanical thrombectomy were initiated and are actively recruiting patients. Still, there are some not yet properly solved hazards of mechanical thrombectomy. Intensive research leading to methodologic refinement of endovascular stroke treatment should accompany the ongoing trials to increase the chance of positive trial results.

Spread of thrombus material to previously unaffected vessel territories can be observed in mechanical recanalization procedures. Though this spread may increase ischemic damage and hamper clinical outcome, it was not thoroughly investigated in the past. For this reason we chose it as a target for our investigation. From our institutional database we selected 105 consecutive patients treated for isolated middle cerebral artery occlusion by mechanical thrombectomy between 2008 and 2012. In the latter subjects we assessed the frequency of treatment-induced anterior cerebral artery emboli. Meticulous reading of postprocedural angiographic images revealed new embolic occlusions of anterior cerebral artery branches in 11.4% (12 of 105). Thus, spread of thrombus material was identified as a relatively frequent procedural side effect. Six major anterior cerebral artery branch occlusions were treated by mechanical recanalization and 5 of 6 targets were successfully recanalized with no side effects. Postprocedural imaging revealed ischemic infarcts in the anterior cerebral artery territory in 5.5% (6 of 105)  of patients, and in 3.8% (4 of 104), motor or supplementary motor areas were affected, suggesting a relevant impact on motor function recovery. Three patients receiving additional anterior cerebral artery recanalization procedures developed new infarcts.

Procedural and technical details may influence the frequency of anterior cerebral artery emboli. A further analysis revealed that 11 of 12 events were caused by a stent retriever, but we were not able to identify a statistically significant association with a specific device. Interestingly, there was a trend for fewer new emboli with the use of distal access catheters (3.3% vs. 14.6%). The latter allow navigation into the middle cerebral artery, bypassing the anterior cerebral artery origin and aspirate directly at the proximal end of the thrombus.  “Distal aspiration” protects the anterior cerebral artery from inadvertent thrombus spread.

Since we made this analysis we have systematically introduced “distal aspiration” into our clinical practice. We recently re-analyzed our treatment results and the trend converted into a statistically significant benefit (personal observation, unpublished data). Thus, we can recommend “distal aspiration” for MCA recanalization procedures. Having solved this issue, future projects will address the topic of thrombus fragmentation and downstream emboli. We aim to develop a comprehensive concept on how to avoid proximal and distal embolization in acute stroke treatment.

 

Read this article at AJNR.org …