Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on “Stroke Code” Imaging Utilization and Yield - AJNR News Digest
July-August 2021
ADULT BRAIN

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on “Stroke Code” Imaging Utilization and Yield

Shatzkes picture

Deborah R. Shatzkes

This paper is not about imaging in stroke, nor is it about stroke physiology or even the incidence of stroke in COVID-19. This paper, born from the observations of a group of suddenly less busy neuroradiologists at a large Manhattan hospital, reports the decrease in the monthly incidence of stroke code imaging during matched periods of 2019 and 2020, including New York City’s first COVID-19 wave of 2020. Basically, as we sat in our new home offices, reading only inpatient and emergency department studies, chatting about our experiences, we wondered where all the strokes had gone. As a dedicated head and neck imager, I had even more time on my hands than most, since the cancer and elective ENT-related studies that form the basis of my practice nearly disappeared. As such, I was chosen to shepherd the first brain imaging paper I have first-authored in over 2 decades through to publication in AJNR.

It seemed counterintuitive. Certainly, everyone understood that elective imaging had to stop. There was no way that preoperative studies in degenerative spine disease, chronic sinusitis, and even benign brain tumors like meningioma could continue in the nightmare that was NYC in March and April of 2020. We watched (remotely) as hospital unit after unit was converted into COVID-19 wards, and quickly understood that while we saw the occasional neuroimaging study, this was not primarily a central nervous system disease (and only later did the extent of the neurologic sequelae become apparent). Still, we expected that acute disease, including stroke, would continue at prepandemic rates. Yet at a hospital where 6–8 stroke codes per day was not unusual, we were seeing far fewer. We decided to quantify our observations and, because we suspected that all but the sickest patients might be staying home, assess positivity rates as well.

With the chaos of the first wave resulting in so many changes in variables, including patient willingness to seek medical care, availability of ambulances, and potential reluctance of emergency department personnel to activate codes for less compelling clinical presentations, it became clear that determining the etiology of our observed drop in the number of codes with simultaneous increase in positivity rates would be impossible. The realization that the infection resulted in alteration of coagulation further complicated the issue. However, we believe that our results are useful indicators of what to expect with utilization of stroke codes and other emergent imaging during pandemic surges and support our impression that the patients who make their way to the hospital in this setting are likely to be the sickest.

Read this article at AJNR.org …