Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
Low Back Pain - AJNR News Digest
November-December 2018
Introduction
IVD degeneration

Low Back Pain

Vahe Zohrabian

Vahe Zohrabian

Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide.1 The most common cause is mechanical, and although most individuals recover in a short amount of time with minimal intervention, recurrences are common, and some will even go on to experience “chronic” pain, or pain lasting longer than 3 months. It is often difficult to isolate an anatomic correlate of LBP because a number of structures in the lumbar spine, including, but not limited to, vertebrae, discs, facet joints, muscles, and ligaments, may serve as active pain generators.2-4 However, it is important to note that such a determination is typically not necessary, as the primary treatment of uncomplicated LBP is usually conservative and aimed at symptom alleviation.

Routine imaging in LBP is not recommended, given that modalities often have false-positive and false-negative results. Imaging in acute LBP has not been shown to yield new, significant findings or alter outcomes5-6 and its role in chronic LBP is even more dubious. Previous studies have shown that a large proportion of individuals without LBP have disc herniations.7-9 In addition, a study by Savage et al10 revealed that nearly a third of asymptomatic patients had abnormal lumbar spine findings characterized by disc degeneration, disc bulging, facet hypertrophy, or nerve root compression, and that less than half of patients with back pain had an identifiable abnormality. The American College of Physicians currently recommends imaging for severe, progressive neurologic deficits, or in the setting of certain “red flags,” such as new urinary retention or overflow incontinence, a history of cancer, a recent invasive spinal procedure, and significant trauma, as well as in those who fail conservative treatment.

In those instances when imaging is warranted, MRI has the greatest potential to identify pathoanatomic contributors to LBP, serving especially useful in interventional and/or surgical planning and in uncovering serious pathology. Advances in MRI have been used to evaluate several different aspects of LBP, such as biochemical disc changes in degenerative disc disease, through MR spectroscopy, T1rho, T2 relaxation time measurement, and diffusion quantitative imaging, albeit not without challenge. DWI, DTI, and MR neurography have even been utilized in the evaluation of lumbosacral radiculopathy. In this edition of the AJNR News Digest, 4 authors discuss novel, exciting research that serves to further our understanding of the pathophysiology of LBP.

References

  1. Smith E, Hoy DG, Cross M, et al. The global burden of other musculoskeletal disorders: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1462–69, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204680.
  2. Kellgren JH. Observations on referred pain arising from muscle. Clin Sci 1938;3:175–90.
  3. Kellgren JH. On the distribution of pain arising from deep somatic structures with charts of segmental pain areas. Clin Sci 1939;4:35–46.
  4. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ. The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22:181-187.
  5. Carragee E, Alamin T, Cheng I, et al. Are first-time episodes of serious LBP associated with new MRI findings? Spine J 2006;6:624-635, 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.005.
  6. Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, et al. Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009;373:463-472, 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60172-0.
  7. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:403-408.
  8. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994;331:69-73, 10.1056/NEJM199407143310201.
  9. Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, et al. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations.  Spine 1995;20:2613-2625.
  10. Savage RA, Whitehouse GH, Roberts N. The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males. Eur Spine J 1997;6:106-114, 10.1007/BF01358742.

Image from: O. Togao, A. Hiwatashi, T. Wada, et al. A Qualitative and Quantitative Correlation Study of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Using Glycosaminoglycan Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer, Pfirrmann Grade, and T1-ρ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018 May.