Malignancies in the head and neck and their nodal involvement often present in an advanced stage that reduces the chances for successful treatment and prolonged survival rates. Though clinical endoscopic examination is the cornerstone of therapeutic strategies, follow-up is hampered by unspecific tissue changes, whereas the response on the increasingly used neo-adjuvant therapy regimens is often inadequately assessed by conventional CT and MR imaging. Perfusion imaging, which visualizes the tissue pathophysiology, is mandatory in order to monitor the disease during and after the completion of organ-preserving radio(chemo)therapy and, thus, prompt accurately timed treatment tailoring prior to any delayed morphologic changes. Long-term retrospective survival studies of patients undergoing standardized operative treatment followed by radio(chemo)therapy are also important, because the baseline perfusion values have evidence-based predictive and prognostic value and may trigger individualized radiotherapy principles in the future. These fundamental conceptual changes of treatment planning are required for the move to individualized medicine, and thus, perfusion CT and MRI receive increasing acceptance among radiologists worldwide. This is also reflected in the numerous PubMed entries, as well as in the international meetings, where perfusion imaging is a “hot topic” and is extensively debated.
The feedback from my work in this field is encouraging, showing that young radiologists are engaged in continuing the research, extending the evidence, or improving the technique. They even go the extra mile by examining perfusion CT and MRI in combination with metabolic imaging (PET or MR spectroscopy). In my opinion, the principles, feasibility, and long-term predictive value of perfusion imaging are evident and well-documented; they present the “Ariadne’s thread” to resolve the remaining issues. In this direction, we need to cooperate with the head and neck oncologists and introduce novel paradigms and experimental protocols in order to expand our knowledge for the intratreatment value of the technique, the possible hampering “diagnostic artifacts” that need to be circumvented, and the utility of the technique in clinically relevant nodal imaging. My collaborators and I are currently further investigating this topic and hope to present our results in the future.
Read these articles at AJNR.org: