Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
Temporal Evolution of Disc in Young Patients with Low Back Pain and Stress Reaction in Lumbar Vertebrae - AJNR News Digest
November-December 2018
Spine

Temporal Evolution of Disc in Young Patients with Low Back Pain and Stress Reaction in Lumbar Vertebrae

Aseem Sharma

Aseem Sharma

As a clinical neuroradiologist exposed to many MR scans of the lumbar spine, I have always found it intriguing that despite a number of predispositions affecting any given patient’s propensity to develop disc degeneration, individual discs within that patient often demonstrate marked variation in the extent of degeneration. My subsequent research into the natural history of disc degeneration has been guided by this “disc specific” nature of this disease process.

My initial research experiments were aimed at trying to analyze the pattern of disc degeneration as seen through the lens of clinical MRI, but deconstructed at the level of individual components of the intervertebral disc – the annulus fibrosus, the nucleus pulposus, and the end plates.1-3 Results of these studies pointed towards significant disruptions in either the annulus fibrosus (more frequent and more often affect the caudal segments of the lumbar spine) or the end plates (less frequent and more often affect the cranial segments of the lumbar spine) in progressive nuclear degeneration.In addition to suggesting that annular pathology is often antecedent to the nuclear degeneration, these results indicated that the disc-specific nature of disc degeneration could possibly be related to mechanical stresses that might initiate this process via disruption of the annulus or the end plates.

Given the complexity of motion experienced by the spinal column even during normal, day-to-day activities, we considered it likely that different discs would be exposed to different levels of mechanical stresses. Once again, clinical experience came in handy to test this hypothesis. Young patients presenting with back pain related to stress reaction in posterior elements of the lumbar spine provided a population in which the discs attached to the stressed vertebrae could be safely assumed to be exposed to higher mechanical stresses, while other discs could provide control discs that could be assumed to have seen a lesser extent of mechanical stresses.

The initial cross-sectional study, the results of which were presented at the International Society for Study of the Lumbar Spine Annual Meeting in 2014, demonstrated a higher burden of degeneration in stressed discs.4 A subsequent study published in AJNR,5 while confirming the initial findings, also demonstrated evidence for progressive nuclear degeneration in stressed segments with relative stability of appearance of nonstressed discs.

We think that this study provides useful insight into the natural history of disc degeneration and specifically into the role of mechanical stresses in initiating disc degeneration. As a byproduct, the study does raise some important, clinically relevant questions. This study demonstrated evidence for progressive disc degeneration in many young children who presented with low back pain related to stress-related bony injuries, sometimes despite subsequent healing of bone. We need long-term follow-up studies to know how these children fare clinically, for years or even decades, after this initial presentation.

References

  1. Sharma A, Parsons M, Pilgram T. Temporal interactions of degenerative changes in individual components of the lumbar intervertebral discs: a sequential magnetic resonance imaging study in patients less than 40 years of age. Spine 2011;36:1794–1800, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821590ad.
  2. Sharma A, Pilgram T, Wippold FJ II. Association between annular tears and disk degeneration: a longitudinal study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:500–06, 10.3174/ajnr.A1411.
  3. Sharma A, Parsons MS, Pilgram TK. Temporal association of annular tears and nuclear degeneration: lessons from the pediatric population. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1541–45, 10.3174/ajnr.A1625.
  4. Sharma A, Lancaster S, Bagade S, et al. Early pattern of degenerative changes in individual components of intervertebral discs in stressed and nonstressed segments of lumbar spine: an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 2014;39:1084–90, 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000265.
  5. Sharma A, Sargar K, Salter A. Temporal evolution of disc in young patients with low back pain and stress reaction in lumbar vertebrae. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1647–52, 10.3174/ajnr.A5237.

Read this article at AJNR.org...