Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
Voxel-Based Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescents - AJNR News Digest
March 2014
Brain

Voxel-Based Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescents

Zili David Chu

Zili David Chu

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) and concussions are major causes of morbidity and disability in the United States and throughout the world. Disruption of white matter integrity is thought to contribute to persistent difficulties in cognitive, memory, and executive functions as well as emotional and somatic complaints. Up to now, a limited number of imaging techniques have been shown to be sensitive to these changes in the acute phase following mild TBI (MTBI), including MR DTI. In the acute phase of MTBI, finding affected regions is challenging. In our exploratory work, we used the voxel-based linear regression method to investigate whole-brain integrity and identified common regions affected following MTBI.

Our long-term goal is to find regions of interest commonly affected by TBI, and also to build normative databases for different healthy age groups. A comparison z-score map of an individual patient against the obtained values in a normative database can be a useful indicator to reveal the degree of injury in the acute phase, and provides additional information to help physicians make early decisions regarding treatments.

This was a preliminary study with a relatively small sample size. There remains significant interest in the application of DTI findings to uncover pathology at the individual patient level. Because of challenges related to building large normative datasets, including scanner comparability between vendors, protocol differences, and analytic techniques, there is a long way to go before DTI can provide an indicator for clinical diagnosis leading to early intervention. However, changes in the acute phase in our findings will help physicians better understand the impact of these injuries on patients, at least in a qualitative way. In addition, DTI could provide an objective tool to assist in the diagnosis of MTBI, which is currently based upon subjective clinical assessment and patient report.

There has been a lot of encouraging feedback from all over the world. People are interested in the possible mechanisms behind the fractional anisotropy and ADC change in the acute phase as well as image processing methodologies.

In the evaluation of a patient with TBI, assessment of brain functioning is as important as assessment of the structural change in white matter. Therein, the functional MRI is another useful tool utilized in our research in recent years to study the brain activation patterns after MTBI, either in the resting state or with a series of stimulating tasks.

New findings will be presented at conferences and as peer-reviewed papers along the way as we accumulate data.

 

Read this article at AJNR.org . . .