Warning: Declaration of My_Walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $data_object, $depth = 0, $args = NULL, $current_object_id = 0) in /home2/ajnrblog/public_html/ajnrdigest/wp-content/themes/ajnr/functions.php on line 258
WEB Intrasaccular Flow Disruptor — Prospective, Multicenter Experience in 83 Patients with 85 Aneurysms - AJNR News Digest
March 2015
Interventional

WEB Intrasaccular Flow Disruptor — Prospective, Multicenter Experience in 83 Patients with 85 Aneurysms

Chrisanthi Papagiannaki

Chrisanthi Papagiannaki

Intrasaccular flow disruption is an innovative endovascular aneurysm treatment. The WEB-DL (Woven EndoBridge Dual-Layer; Sequent Medical, Aliso Viejo, California) is an intra-aneurysmal flow disruption device developed to modify the  blood flow at the aneurysm neck and, therefore, to promote thrombosis of the aneurysm sac. It has been used mainly to treat complex wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms, and the feasibility of this treatment, as well as its safety and efficacy, have so far been demonstrated in small retrospective series conducted in highly specialized centers.

Our aim was to examine the feasibility and the short-term anatomic and clinical results of this technique in a large prospective series of patients treated in several neurointerventional centers.

Our results show a feasibility of 92.9%, with low permanent morbidity (1.3%) and no mortality, and confirm the previously published findings. Endovascular treatment with the WEB can be applied to unruptured, ruptured, and recanalized aneurysms without the need to pretreat patients with double antiaggregation, and this is an advantage compared with other techniques, especially in the context of a subarrachnoid hemorrage. WEB intrasaccular flow disruption seems to be a promising technique, due mainly to its technical feasibility.

There are drawbacks of the WEB, namely the large size of the microcatheters needed and the low visibility of the device — issues that have been addressed and improved in its newer version and which, nonetheless, don’t increase the treatment failure rates or the morbi-mortality rates compared with large series of simple coiling or other endovascular treatment published in the literature.

Short-term anatomic results are good, a fact that supports the efficacy of the WEB in the treatment of wide-neck aneurysms that have always been a challenge. The question that remains is whether long-term clinical and anatomic results in the patients included in this series will prove as good, and this is the future perspective of  our work concerning this series: to present the results in terms of recanalization and retreatment rates of the aneurysms treated with the WEB-DL.

 

Read this article at AJNR.org …